What “civilian national security force” may really mean

Well, as promised, I’m bringing you the information Jim Quinn got from his Washington insider, known as “son of deep throat”. Earlier this month, Obama said that our military is not capable of protecting and defending us (though I thought there was nothing we needed protection from…?), and as a result, he will institute a “civilian national security force”. The dazzled ObaMessiah fans in the audience applauded away, but some were rather curious as to what on earth the Messiah meant by this.

For one thing, his election isn’t going to simply vaporize evil around the world? The bad guys won’t turn themselves in, grovel at his feet, repent for their sins, and beg for his forgiveness? Wow…what a disappointment for the man who can stop the oceans for rising! Maybe he has limits after all?

Well, those queries aside, here’s the scoop, via Jim Quinn of Pittsburgh’s War Room.

It ain’t pretty.

Barack Obama is basing his plans for this civilian force on something whipped up by Canadian Senator Jacques Hebert, called the “Katimavik“. Katimavik is the Inuit word for “commune”. Hebert, an admitted communist and avowed socialist, was a big supporter of the USSR and communist China as far back as the 60s and 70s. In the late 70s, he came up with the idea for and initiated Katimavik, in an attempt to get rid of Canada’s version of the ROTC, the volunteer military cadets. Hebert called his Katimavik a “people’s peace brigade” (hello, China!).

Hebert’s organization eventually did replace Canada’s cadet programs as the country continued moving to the left. The program meant 2 years of unpaid service in return for a college education paid for by the taxpayers, regardless of grades or criminal history (those gentle Canucks). The “service” rendered took place in bureaucratic jobs, as the young people also took government-provided classes about the ‘proper’ operation of government, systems of government around the world, and other multi-cultural/global citizen type education. Katimavik members were also required to learn two languages other than the ones they already spoke (generally English and French).

Other than government-education, not being paid for work, forcing taxpayers to pay for the education of children not their own (twice over!), and indoctrinating young people into a bureaucratic state of mind while removing a proud, patriotic love of country, not bad. Especially when one recalls that Hitler, Stalin, and Mao installed these sorts of programs too, complete with mandatory enrollment.

When the conservatives regained power in the 80s, Katimavik was ended due to its clear communist heritage. Unfortunately, in 1985 the program was reinstated when the lefties took charge once again.

This is Barack’s inspiration for his “civilian national security force”, though there are some key differences. Barack may have gotten this idea from his avowed Communist mentor and CPUSA member Frank Marshall Davis, who called this sort of thing a “heroic and necessary program for America”.

According to Quinn, Barack’s own youth peace brigade (in addition to healing powers, I suppose) is meant to get youth involved with and in the government, but not in the time-honoured, or at least Founding Fathers intended, American fashion.

First of all, Barack intends it to be mandatory for all Americans. They are to serve two years, without pay, after high school and before going to trade school or college. Of course, that education will be paid for by the American taxpayer, and I presume living expenses during the two years of work will be supplied by We, The People as well.

Though this sort of thing is nowhere supported in the US Constitution, it does get millions to work for the government, without pay no less, and means a yearly expansion of government, bureaucracy, and fatter cloven hooves in Washington. It is also a way to reinstate the draft without saying so, and without paying anyone. Unsurprisingly, the NAACP, civil rights groups, and black liberation ‘churches’ love this plan, as do the Muslim groups.

According to Jim Quinn’s source, it is the ObaMessiah’s intention to cut the (paid and very highly skilled) US military by ninety percent. That is not a typo on my part, as difficult to imagine as it is. The budget will be cut by 50% (the other 40, I presume, can pay for those youths in the civilian security force). The youth peace brigade/national security force members will go through boot camp and then service with no pay. As I said Friday, this is clearly a way to undercut support for the military, and as Jim pointed out on the air today, a way to keep socialist, Marxist, and Islamist leaders around the world safe from the butt-kicking arm of the United States.

Jim closed by noting that the world is very excited about the idea of a “neutered America at the hands of Barack Obama”. Doubtless Ahminajihad, Chavez, Kim Jong-Il, communist China, and other assorted tyrants and dictators are thrilled, because with such a hamstrung military and an unpaid “security force” made up of those who are forced to serve regardless of ability, no one will want to go to war with these bastards no matter what they do: nuke Europe, nuke Washington, take out Israel, whatever.

 In a nutshell, this means that you and your children would be forced by Barack (and Michelle, because let’s face it, she’s more frightening than Obama, and that is saying a LOT) to “serve your country”, unpaid, all while sitting in classes meant to encourage you to thoughtlessly trust in, depend upon, and support the government, and God only knows what else. 

What did I say about slavery? 

This raises a lot of questions, to say the least. Would Americans stand for this? They might, they might…most of them are rather drowsy and uninformed.

This plan steals two years of Americans’ lives, years they could instead be building a family, a business, a church, or a charity of their own (imagine that). It’s also a great way to undermine the family and one’s faith, because I guarantee certain faiths will be denigrated beyond belief from positions of authority.

As far as the education…Who will pay all of these instructors, and what will they be teaching? Moreover, which will they not be allowed to teach? With “government” paying for everyone’s college education, that means government will also have the right to dictate curriculum and activities. It’s not hard to imagine just how far that power will reach, is it? Could a per-family child limit be far behind?

I’ll say it again: Barack Obama is a tyrant in the wings. He’s smooth and slick and well-produced (though he can barely put four words together without a script or TelePrompter), but as all should know, appearances can be very, very deceptive.